Saturday 11 January 2014

Don't you agree?





Posted by at

30 comments:

  1. Nomika11 January 2014 at 21:44

    Haha it's true ! I understood this sentance after reading it several times, though ..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13 January 2014 at 17:43

      Me too, I had to read this many time ! ^^

      Rider.

      Delete
  2. Anonymous12 January 2014 at 09:41

    Just Awesome! OtonTik

    ReplyDelete
  3. RockNBlur12 January 2014 at 11:06

    Hahaha, I didn't understood this sentence at the first times I read it! n__n

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous12 January 2014 at 15:39

    I'm agree it's the truth I tkink

    Teddy Bear

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous12 January 2014 at 16:16

    Very strange tongue ^^

    PonPonPon

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous12 January 2014 at 17:48

    I don't understant this sentance.. It is very strange..
    Lala

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13 January 2014 at 09:20

      I don't understand either x)

      -Tommo-

      Delete
  7. Anonymous13 January 2014 at 09:30

    I don't understand, it's too strange !
    Mickael.J-King

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mrs P.13 January 2014 at 12:33

      Ce qu'il avait eu (had had) n'avait eu aucun effet (had had no), etc... C'est parce que HAVe est à la fois auxiliaire (pour construire le present perfect HAVE + Participe Passé) et le Pluperfect (HAD + Participe Passé) et verbe (AVOIR)...

      Delete
    2. Anonymous16 January 2014 at 13:09

      Thank you Mrs.P lol
      ~AMAZILENA~

      Delete
    3. Anonymous16 January 2014 at 13:17

      Oh... In french or not, I think that I will never understand x)

      Grapefruit---

      Delete
    4. Imnotyou17 January 2014 at 08:43

      In french it looks harder

      Delete
  8. Bobbie.13 January 2014 at 13:30

    Oh yes I get it!
    (with your explications Mrs P.) ;)

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous13 January 2014 at 18:51

    There are a lot kind of sentences like this ? :o
    Kiwi~

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous13 January 2014 at 18:59

    I think the french version would also seem weird to an english student studying french hehe

    PAPERPLANE

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous14 January 2014 at 13:17

    I didn't understand x)

    Grapefruit---

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous14 January 2014 at 13:25

    I don't undestand this setence



    by grecy

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous14 January 2014 at 18:26

    I didn't understand, someone explain to me please?
    -YMCMB

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16 January 2014 at 13:11

      Read Mrs.P reply on Mickeal J-King's comment, very useful lol
      ~AMAZILENA~

      Delete
  14. Yaya Tamtam14 January 2014 at 19:12

    Hum I think I'm stupid because I don't understand... :p

    ReplyDelete
  15. Imnotyou16 January 2014 at 08:36

    I finally understood! after many tentatives! I admit it is fun

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anonymous16 January 2014 at 20:17

    It is pretty funny! ^^
    SweetLisa

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous16 January 2014 at 23:57

    That make me laught !! No I joke. I don't understand. I'm a poop.

    Tsitsa.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Maelstorm17 January 2014 at 16:51

    I had a brain fart after reading it once. I'm not gonna try and understand that!

    ReplyDelete
  19. Anonymous17 January 2014 at 21:58

    It's cute ;) ! It's good I'm not wrong of article ^^

    K-Za.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Anonymous18 January 2014 at 19:57

    I have understood after have read many times and read the explications of mrs P. haha.

    Camka.

    ReplyDelete
  21. BlueTiara18 January 2014 at 23:12

    This sentence makes perfect sense to me, Shakespeare's language is so amazing !

    ReplyDelete
  22. Anonymous19 January 2014 at 17:16

    I did not understand :/
    By Oceka

    ReplyDelete
  23. Anonymous19 January 2014 at 21:59

    It's smart! I didn't understand at first, but now I get it!

    Eniram

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)